Basic
Advanced

Field

Condition

Type of search

Value

Showing 9021 - 9030 of +10000 Records

Miniature of Certificate of Commission Action

Certificate of Commission Action

Part of: Electronic Documents of Illinois

Wayne C. Krahmer -vs Commonwealth Edison Company: Complaint as to false utility charges in Freeport Illinois.

PDF

Miniature of Certificate of Commission Action

Certificate of Commission Action

Part of: Electronic Documents of Illinois

Efrain Lopez -vs- Spark Energy Gas, LP: Complaint as to being slammed by Spark Energy in Glenview, Illinois.

PDF

Miniature of Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Part of: Electronic Documents of Illinois

Section 6.1 of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315/6.1 (2012) added by Public Act 97-1172 (eff. April 5, 2013), allows the Governor of the State of Illinois to designate certain public employment positions with the State of Illinois as excluded from collective bargaining rights which might otherwise be granted under the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act. There are three broad categories of positions which may be so designated: 1) positions which were first certified to be in a bargaining unit by the Illinois Labor Relations Board on or after December 2, 2008, 2) positions which were the subject of a petition for such certification pending on April 5, 2013 (the effective date of Public Act 97-1172), or 3) positions which have never been certified to have been in a collective bargaining unit. Only 3,580 of such positions may be so designated by the Governor, and, of those, only 1,900 positions which have already been certified to be in a collective bargaining unit.

PDF

Miniature of Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Part of: Electronic Documents of Illinois

On March 18, 2014 Administrative Law Judge Elaine L. Tarver, on behalf of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned matter. No party filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's Recommendation during the time allotted, and at its May 13, 2014 public meeting, the Board, having reviewed the matter, declined to take it up on its own motion.

PDF

Miniature of Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Part of: Electronic Documents of Illinois

Frank Marasco -vs- Oak Brook Park District: On December 17, 2014, Administrative Law Judge Kelly Coyle issued a Recommended Decision and Order dismissing a charge filed by non-union employee Frank Marasco (Charging Party) against the Oak Brook Park District, which alleged that the Respondent violated Section 10(a)(1) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (2012), when it discharged the Charging Party allegedly in retaliation for voicing concerns over the Respondent's decision to terminate certain employees.

PDF

Miniature of Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Part of: Electronic Documents of Illinois

Illinois Council of Police -vs- Village of Elburn: On December 15, 2014, Administrative Law Judge Martin Kehoe issued a Recommended Decision and Order dismissing a charge filed by the Illinois Council of Police against the Village of Elburn alleging that the Respondent violated Section 10(a)(4) and (1) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (2012), when it allegedly refused to bargain over its decision not to fill a vacant bargaining unit position and thereby eroded the unit.

PDF

Miniature of Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Part of: Electronic Documents of Illinois

Tyron McCullough -vs- Harvey Park District: On July 16, 2014, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Deena Sanceda issued a Recommended Decision and Order (RDO), recommending that the Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel, order Respondent Harvey Park District to comply with orders previously issued by the Board in consolidated Case Nos.S-CA-12-197-C, S-CA-12-201-C and S-CA-12-211-C, modified only to provide for the accrual of additional back pay and interest accumulating since isuance of those orders. Respondent filed timely exceptions to the ALJ's RDO pursuant to Section 1200.135 of the Board's rules and regulations, 80 Ill. Admin. Code (sec) 1200.135, and Charging Party, Tyron McCullough, filed a response. After reviewing the exceptions, the response, and the record, we accept the ALJ's recommendation for the reasons articulated in the RDO, and order Respondent to comply with the Compliance Officer's order as modified to allow for additional back pay and interest accruing since the date that order was issued.

PDF

Miniature of Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Part of: Electronic Documents of Illinois

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 700 -vs- Illinois State Toll Highway Authority: On January 23, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Deena Sanceda (ALJ) issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned case, recommending the Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel, find that employees in the title of Sign Shop Manager, Sign Shop Supervisor, Road Electric Manager, Central Garage Manager, and Central Garage Supervisor employed by the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority were not supervisors within the meaning of Section 3(r) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (2014), as amended, (Act), and that a secret ballot election should be conducted among those employees to determine if they wished to be represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 700, or have No Representation. The ALJ also recommended that the Board find that employees in the titles of Maintenance Section Managers and Maintenance Section Supervisors were supervisors within the meaning of the Act and should be excluded from the petitioned-for unit.

PDF

Miniature of Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Part of: Electronic Documents of Illinois

Department of Central Management Services (Department of Human Services) and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31 and Deborah Daniels, George Dirks, Jayne Halcomb, Alex Jordan, Cassandra Laird, Debrar Murrill, Kelly Schultz, Steve Totten: Section 6.1 of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (2012), allows the Governor to designate certain employment positions with the State of Illinois as excluded from collective bargaining rights which might otherwise be available under Section 6 of the Act. This case involves such designations made on the Governors behalf by the Illinois Department of Central Management Services (CMS). On March 21, 2014, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Michelle Owen issued a Recommended Decision and Order (RDO) in this case, finding that the designations were properly made.

PDF

Miniature of Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Decisions and Opinions of the Illinois State Labor Relations Board

Part of: Electronic Documents of Illinois

County of Will and Will County State;s Attorney -vs- American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31: On April 11, 2014, Administrative Law Judge Anna Hamburg-Gal issued a Recommended Decision and Order in which she determined that the unit clarification petition filed by the County of Will and the Will County State's Attorney (Petitioners) was appropriate and should be granted. Applying Office of the Cook Cnty. State's Attorney v. Ill. Local Labor Rel. Bd., 166 Ill. 2d 296 (1995), she determined that the Will County Assistant State's Attorneys employed by the Petitioners and certified into a collective bargaining unit in our prior Case No. S-VR-93-001, were not public employees within the meaning of Section 3(n) of the Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315/3(n)(2012), and therefore should be excluded from any existing bargaining unit.

PDF