Policemen's Benevolent Labor Committee -vs- City of East Peoria: On July 24, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Sarah R. Kerley, on behalf of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned matter. No party filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judges Recommendation during the time allotted, and at its November 17, 2015 Public meeting, the Board, having reviewed the matter, declined to take it up on its own motion.
Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois: Request pursuant to Section 6-102(d) of the Illinois Public Utilities Act to incur indebtedness by undertaking the obligation to pay the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, on up to $200,000,000 principal amount of Senior Secured Notes for the purpose of refunding, redeeming and/or refinancing outstanding evidences of indebtedness.
Wayne-White Counties Electric Cooperative and Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois: Joint Petition for approval of residential customer release.
Joint petition for approval of amendment No 2 to the service area agreement between Eastern Illini Electric Cooperative, Inc. and Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois
Illinois Commerce Commission On Its Own Motion -vs- Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company: Approval of agreed penalty for violation of federal rules incorporated by the ICC and of 83 Ill. Adm. Code 590.
Policemen's Benevolent Labor Committee -vs- City of East Peoria: On July 24, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Sarah R. Kerley, on behalf of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned matter. No party filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judges Recommendation during the time allotted, and at its November 17, 2015 Public meeting, the Board, having reviewed the matter, declined to take it up on its own motion.
Metropolitan Alliance of Police, Niles Police Sergeants, Chapter 358 -vs- Village of Niles: On July 21, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Deena Sanceda, on behalf of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned matter. No party filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judges Recommendation during the time allotted, and at its November 17, 2015 Public meeting, the Board, having reviewed the matter, declined to take it up on its own motion.